LinkedIn shows you one person's résumé. The graph shows you the aggregate flow — where an elite firm's people go once they leave. And the real signal isn't that they leave. It's that they leave and go run the place: a whole generation of asset managers founded and led by two firms' alumni.
One query per firm — prior_employer → current firm + AUM. Not a
handful of famous names: hundreds of professionals, mapped from their own filed bios to where they landed.
The graph filters the flow to the tell that matters — destinations where an alum is now Founder, CEO, or Managing Partner. That's not talent leaking; that's talent compounding into new institutions:
$60B, $39B, $36B in assets — run by people two firms trained and lost. That concentration is invisible on any individual résumé; it only appears when you map the flow.
LinkedIn (or any bio search) is one profile at a time — you can read that Sadek Wahba was at Morgan Stanley, but you can't see that a $60B firm and a $39B firm and a $36B firm are all run by the same firm's alumni. The graph resolves people to companies and companies to AUM, so the flow and the concentration become one queryable picture: where does talent go, where does it lead, and which competitor is quietly staffed by the people you trained. Point it at any firm to map its diaspora — a recruiting map, a competitive- intel map, and an investment signal all at once.